Home → Case Studies → Azura Financial
From 3 hours to 30 minutes per loan file
The starting point
Azura Financial is a small-to-mid Australian mortgage brokerage running roughly 20 settled loans per month. Like most brokerages at that scale, the loan-writing workflow looked like this: client meeting, fact-find, bank pricing comparison, document collection, aggregator data entry, compliance documentation, valuation ordering, lodgement.
The bottleneck was not selling. It was the admin between the conversations.
The problem in numbers
Before SecondBrain, the team was spending an average of 3 to 4 hours per loan file on the post-fact-find administrative work. Broken down:
- Bank pricing comparison: 30–45 minutes per file. Logging into each lender's broker portal in turn, pulling indicative pricing, and assembling a comparison in a spreadsheet.
- Aggregator data entry: 90–120 minutes per file. Manually re-keying 300+ fields from client documents into the aggregator platform.
- Document renaming and compliance logging: 30–45 minutes per file. Renaming PDFs to the standard convention, dropping them into the right folder structure, logging them in the compliance register.
- Valuation ordering: 15–30 minutes per file. Choosing the right valuation type per lender policy and submitting through the aggregator.
At 20 files a month, that's roughly 60–80 hours of admin — most of a full-time role, eaten by tasks that were repetitive and rule-based.
What changed
Azura adopted SecondBrain in two stages.
Stage 1 — Sharp for bank pricing
The team started with Sharp, SecondBrain's bank pricing product, deployed into their existing Microsoft 365 tenant. The new workflow:
- Broker drops a client request into the Sharp Teams channel — loan amount, property value, borrower profile.
- Sharp queries every lender on Azura's panel simultaneously.
- Full pricing comparison comes back into the same Teams channel in approximately 4 minutes.
That single change took bank pricing from 30–45 minutes per file to under 4 minutes — typically while the broker was still on the phone with the client.
Stage 2 — Full SecondBrain workflow
Once the team trusted the pricing automation, they added the rest: automated aggregator data entry (300+ fields populated from uploaded documents), automated document renaming and compliance logging, and automated valuation ordering. All four workflows run inside the same Microsoft 365 tenant the team already used for Teams, Outlook, and SharePoint.
The result
Average file processing time dropped from 3+ hours to 30 minutes — an 83% reduction. Across 20 files a month, that's roughly 50 hours of broker time returned to the business, with no new headcount.
"SecondBrain reduced our average file processing time from over 3 hours to 30 minutes. The bank pricing, aggregator data entry, and document compliance work that used to take an afternoon now happens in the time it takes to make a coffee. The fact that it runs inside our own Microsoft 365 tenant means we never had a security conversation to have." — Azura Financial
What the time was spent on instead
This is the part broker case studies usually skip. Saving 50 hours a month only matters if those hours go somewhere productive. For Azura, the recovered time went to:
- More client conversations — both new business and existing-client check-ins.
- Better-quality fact-finds. When you're not racing to finish admin, you ask more questions earlier.
- Faster turnaround for clients. Pricing back same-day rather than next-day became normal.
Lessons that translate to other brokerages
Three observations from the rollout that we now apply to every new customer:
- Bank pricing is the right first thing to automate. It has the cleanest before/after metric (minutes saved per request), the lowest risk (read-only operations), and the highest visibility for the team. Trust builds from there.
- Tenant-resident deployment removed the security objection. Because SecondBrain runs inside Azura's own Microsoft 365 environment, the IT and compliance review was minutes rather than weeks. No data leaves their tenant, so there's no "vendor SaaS handling client data" conversation.
- The compounding gains come from the second product. Stage 1 (Sharp alone) was a clear win. Stage 2 (data entry + compliance + valuations) was where the 83% headline number landed, because admin time is dominated by the long tail of small tasks, not one big one.
Setup and ongoing
Total elapsed time from sign-up to live Sharp workspace: under one business day. SecondBrain provisioned the Microsoft 365 workspace and configured the lender panel on Azura's behalf. The team did not run a technical setup.
See what Sharp could do for your brokerage
If you want to walk through your own current workflow and what the numbers might look like, book a free 15-minute call with James.
Book a call →